Cabinet row over Australian trade deal

A battle royal is in progress in Cabinet on whether Britain should agree a tariff free trade deal with Australia.  Brexiteers think that if a trade deal cannot be concluded with Australia no deals will be possible for the new 'Global Britain'.

However, farmers - already reeling from the phasing out of support payments - are concerned that it could hit their markets and be a precedent for future deals, particularly those with the US and New Zealand.

On one side of the argument is international trade secretary Liz Truss.   On the other side is Defra secretary of state George Eustice, backed up by Michael Gove.   Gove is concerned that rural areas in Wales and Scotland would be hard hit, further undermining the union.   Reports are suggesting that Boris Johnson may come down in favour of the deal.

Beef and sheep meat would be the main commodities affected, although Australia is also interested in exporting more cheese.   There is a 20 per cent tariff on beef at present which would be phased out over 15 years.   

Australian farmers benefit from greater economies of scale, allowing them to undercut on price.  The writer well remembers visiting a huge drylot beef farm in New South Wales.

The RSPCA said Australia had lower standards on chlorinated chickens, sow stalls that confine pregnant pigs and growth hormone treatment for beef.

Dysfunctional CAP on its way out, but can farming meet climate change challenge?

The Agriculture Bill which will provide the basis for farm policy in England after Brexit has been published: A boost for the environment and food production

In line with the new policy approach developed by Michael Gove when he was secretary of state at Defra, it is claimed that 'It sets out how farmers and land managers in England will in the future be rewarded with public money for “public goods” – such as better air and water quality, higher animal welfare standards, improved access to the countryside or measures to reduce flooding. This will contribute to the government’s commitment to reaching net zero emissions by 2050, while at the same time, helping to boost farmers’ productivity.' [Farm productivity has been growing slowly.]

'This will replace the current subsidy system of Direct Payments which pays farmers for the total amount of land farmed, skewing payments towards the largest landowners rather than those farmers delivering specific public benefits.' Farmers have been highly reliant on those subsidies to keep their farms viable and the new form of payment is likely to generate a less certain income stream. Overall farm funding will be maintained at current levels, but not adjusted for inflation, for the duration of the current Parliament, i.e., potentially until 2024.

The main concern of farmers is not the domestic legislation but the prospect of imports of cheap food, produced to lower standards, as the result of trade deals: NFU president Minette Batters.

Much of the future for British farming will depend on the adoption of new technological innovations with the prospect of a digital revolution in farming that deserves to be encouraged by appropriate government funding.

Few of us will mourn the disappearance of the dysfunctional CAP which was not well adapted to British farming. However, the ability of British farming to adapt to climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions will be a big challenge for farmers. Recent extreme weather events in the UK including both droughts and floods have brought home the reality of climate change to the farming community.